The Rules of the NBCC’s Good Reads

by admin | Feb-05-2008


The rules for voting in the NBCC’s Good Reads were pretty simple, but important nonetheless. (1) Voters were told to send in votes for books published between spring 2007 and early 2008, otherwise we’d have no consensus. (2) We told voters they could vote for just one book per category. That way everyone’s vote counts equally. (3) Votes could be anonymous. And finally, (4) voters could vote for the same titles they did in the first Best Recommended List, the precursor to this list, in the event they hadn’t come across something that wowed them recently. Interestingly, almost no one elected to revote their old enthusiasms.



Become a Friend of the NBCC

About the Critical Mass Blog

Commentary on literary criticism, publishing, writing, and all things NBCC related. It's written by independent members of the NBCC Board of Directors (see list of bloggers below).

Subscribe

SIGN UP FOR CRITICAL NOTES





Categories & Archives

2007 Awards | 2008 Awards | 2009 Awards | 2010 Awards | 2011 Awards | 2010 Finalists: 31 Books in 30 Days | 2011 Finalists: 30 Books in 30 Days | Conversations with Literary Websites | Critical Library | In Retrospect | NBCC News | NBCC Reads | Small Press Spotlight | What I'm Looking Forward to Reading
Become a Friend of the NBCC

NBCC Awards

See all award winners

Find out how to submit

Read how we select

Frequently Asked Questions

Awards news