Critical Library: Charles Taylor
by Eric Banks | Oct-03-2009
Each week, the National Book Critics Circle will post a list of five books a critic believes reviewers should have in their libraries. We recently heard from film critic, reviewer and columnist Charles Taylor. Here are the books he pointed out.
1) A Collection of Essays by George Orwell —For their clarity, their refusal of cant, sentiment, ideology, or false comfort. A book that reminds the critic of the necessity—and difficulty—of being honest.
2) For Keeps by Pauline Kael —Nervy, funny, passionately argued, committed to the belief that art has to be about pleasure, and that pleasure can come from anywhere. Also because it’s a constant source of irritation to those who have so little backbone they’re threatened by the use of “you” instead of “one.”
3) A Reader’s Manifesto by B.R. Myers— It says something about the blood drawn by Myers’ argument for lucidity in literary prose that the writers who attacked it found it necessary to falsify it to make their (rigged) points. Not one of them has explained why, if Myers is arguing for dumbed-down prose, he extols Conrad, Woolf, Faulkner, and Joyce. Though their insularity does make a pretty good argument for how easily literature could go the way of the spinnet in the parlor.
4) Born in Flames by Howard Hampton—If a critic is any good, he or she will soon tire of the describe, evaluate, sum up form of criticism. Working under the radar for two decades now, Hampton takes leaps as imaginative as any critic now writing.
5) The first two paragraphs of D.H. Lawrence’s essay on John Galsworthy, included in “Phoenix.”—“We judge a work by its effect on our sincere and vital emotion, and nothing else. All the critical twiddle-twaddle about style and form, all this pseudo-scientific classifying and analysing of books in an imitation-botanical fashion, is mere impertinence and mostly dull jargon.”
Charles Taylor is a columnist for the Newark Star-Ledger. He is also a regular contributor to the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Newsday, Dissent, the Nation, and Bloomberg Muse.
1) A Collection of Essays by George Orwell —For their clarity, their refusal of cant, sentiment, ideology, or false comfort. A book that reminds the critic of the necessity—and difficulty—of being honest.
2) For Keeps by Pauline Kael —Nervy, funny, passionately argued, committed to the belief that art has to be about pleasure, and that pleasure can come from anywhere. Also because it’s a constant source of irritation to those who have so little backbone they’re threatened by the use of “you” instead of “one.”
3) A Reader’s Manifesto by B.R. Myers— It says something about the blood drawn by Myers’ argument for lucidity in literary prose that the writers who attacked it found it necessary to falsify it to make their (rigged) points. Not one of them has explained why, if Myers is arguing for dumbed-down prose, he extols Conrad, Woolf, Faulkner, and Joyce. Though their insularity does make a pretty good argument for how easily literature could go the way of the spinnet in the parlor.
4) Born in Flames by Howard Hampton—If a critic is any good, he or she will soon tire of the describe, evaluate, sum up form of criticism. Working under the radar for two decades now, Hampton takes leaps as imaginative as any critic now writing.
5) The first two paragraphs of D.H. Lawrence’s essay on John Galsworthy, included in “Phoenix.”—“We judge a work by its effect on our sincere and vital emotion, and nothing else. All the critical twiddle-twaddle about style and form, all this pseudo-scientific classifying and analysing of books in an imitation-botanical fashion, is mere impertinence and mostly dull jargon.”
Charles Taylor is a columnist for the Newark Star-Ledger. He is also a regular contributor to the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Newsday, Dissent, the Nation, and Bloomberg Muse.
About the Critical Mass Blog
Commentary on literary criticism, publishing, writing, and all things NBCC related. It's written by independent members of the NBCC Board of Directors (see list of bloggers below).
Subscribe
Follow @bookcritics
Categories & Archives
- Adventures in E-Reading |
- Awards |
- 2007 Awards |
- 2008 Awards |
- 30 Books in 30 Days |
- Live announcement of NBCC Awards finalists |
- 2009 Awards |
- 2010 Awards |
- 2011 Awards |
- 31 Books in 31 Days |
- What I'm Looking Forward to Reading |
- Celebrating Philip Roth |
- Conversations with Literary Websites |
- Articles |
- Craft |
- Critical Library |
- Criticism |
- Critical Outtakes: Discussions With Writers |
- In Retrospect |
- Industry News |
- Interviews |
- NBCC Campaign to Save Book Reviews |
- NBCC 35th Anniversary |
- NBCC Featured Review |
- NBCC News |
- Q&A |
- Remembrances |
- NBCC Reads |
- Roundups |
- The Critical I: Conversations With Critics and Review Editors |
- The Next Decade in Book Culture |
- The Rest of the Best |
- Thinking About New Orleans: A Series About New Orleans Writers Post Katrina |
- Videos |
- Small Press Spotlight
Upcoming Events
National Book Critics Circle at the AWP in Chicago: March 02nd, 2012
National Book Critics Circle Awards Finalists Reading: March 07th, 2012
National Book Critics Circle Annual Membership Meeting: March 08th, 2012
National Book Critics Circle Annual Membership Lunch: March 08th, 2012 BUY TICKETS
National Book Critics Circle Awards Ceremony and Reception: March 08th, 2012 BUY TICKETS