Critical Mass, The Blog of the National Book Critics Circle

Maggie Nelson, Bernard Hooper, and Kathryn Harrison

by Taylor Anhalt | Oct-15-2018

Reviews & Interviews

The latest in NBCC's Craft of Criticism series is Tara Cheesman's Q and A with Ilana Masad.

NBCC Emerging Critic Natania Holtzman offers this week's NBCC Reads/Translation post, on David Albahari’s "Leeches."

Sarah McCraw Crow reviewed Deborah Blum’s “The Poison Squad” and Bart van Es’ memoir/family story “The Cut Out Girl” for BookPage.

Kathleen Rooney reviewed Samuel Park’s latest novel “The Caregiver.” She also interviewed poet Emily Jungmin Yoon.

Joshua Claybourn reviewed David Blight’s “Prophet of Freedom” for the Compulsive Reader.

Brian Haman reviewed Yan Lianke's "The Day the Sun Died" in Asian Review of Books.

In VP/Online Jane Ciabattari's Lit Hub column, Kathryn Harrison talks about her favorite LA Memoirs...“I think of L.A. as a floating world, less landscape than smoke and mirrors. When I think of L.A., of growing up there, I think of those mirages on the asphalt, heat that looks like water.” Ciabattari also talked with short story writer Simon Van Booy, author of the collection "The Sadness of Beautiful Things," re: five books about the sadness of love.

Elizabeth Block reviewed Maggie Nelson’s “Something Bright, Then Holes” for The Brooklyn Rail.

Ellen Akins reviewed Leif Enger's novel “Virgil Wander,” Kate Atkinson's “Transcription,” and Maureen Aitken's “Patron Saint of Lost Girls” for the Minneapolis Star Tribune.

NBCC award winner Daniel Mendelsohn reviewed Volume 6 of Knausgaard’s “My Struggle” for the NY Times Book Review. He also wrote about Virgil's "Aeneid" in The New Yorker.

NBCC board member Laurie Hertzel reviewed Kate DiCamillo’s novel “Louisiana’s Way Home” and also interviewed DiCamillo for the Minneapolis Star Tribune. She wrote her weekly column on re-reading books.

Jenny Yacovissi reviewed Marvin Kalb’s recent “Enemy of the People: Trump’s War on the Press, The New McCarthyism, and the Threat to American Democracy” for the Washington Independent Review of Books.

Martha Anne Toll reviewed Esi Edugyan's "Washington Black" for The Millions. She also interviewed for the "Secrets of the Book Critics" series by the Lit Hub/Book Marks.

Balakian award winner Carlos Lozada reviewed Michael Lewis' “The Fifth Risk” for the Washington Post.

Hamilton Cain reviewed “The Shape of the Ruins” by Juan Gabriel Vásquez for the Minneapolis Star Tribune. He also reviewed Lou Berney's “November Road,” a literary website curated by New York Times columnist Margaret Renkl

K. L. Romo reviewed “The Boy at the Keyhole,” Stephen Giles’ quiet twisty tale of madness and possible murder, for Washington Independent Review of Books. She also reviewed “Darling Girl,” a heart-moving tale by Terry H. Watkins, which chronicles 13 years in the precarious life of “DG” Pitre through 23 vignettes, for

Jennifer Howard reviewed "Reader, Come Home," neuroscientist Maryanne Wolf's new book on reading in the digital era, for The Washington Post.

Yvonne Garrett reviewed Iveliss Rodriguez's "Love War Stories," Shelley Jackson's "Riddance," Roy Scranton's "We're Doomed. Now What? Essays on War and Climate Change," and Lydia Kiesling's "The Golden State" for The Brooklyn Rail. He also reviewed Judith Chernaik's "Schumann: The Faces and the Masks" for Publisher's Weekly.

Priscilla Gilman reviewed Haruki Murakami's “Killing Commendatore” for the Boston Globe.

Rayyan Al-Shawaf reviewed “Car Trouble,” a novel by Robert Rorke, for the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Jenny Bhatt reviewed Professor Angela Leighton’s nonfiction book "Hearing Things" (Trinity College, Cambridge) for PopMatters.

Wayne Catan interviewed 1991 PEN/Hemingway Award winner Bernard Cooper for The Hemingway Review Blog. 

Robert Allen Papinchak reviewed Kevin Wilson's short story collection, “Baby, You're Gonna Be Mine” for the Washington Independent Review of Books. He also reviewed Rhys Bowen's “Four Funerals and Maybe A Wedding”; Roberto Saviano's “Pirahanas: The Boy Bosses of Naples”; and Louise Candlish's “Our House” all for Mystery Scene Magazine.

Madeleine Schwartz reviewed Caryl Phillips' “A View of the Empire at Sunset” for The New York Review of Books.

Harvey Freedenberg reviewed Stephen Fried and his new book, “Rush,” a biography of Founding Father Benjamin Rush for the October issue of TheBurg. He also interviewed David Kaplan on “The Most Dangerous Branch,” his new book about the Supreme Court.

NBCC board member Tom Beer reviewed “The Winter Soldier” by Daniel Mason for Newsday.

NBCC member Claude Peck reviewed "Oranges" by Gary Eldon Peter for the Star Tribune.

Heller McAlpin reviewed Nora Krug’s graphic memoir, “Belonging,” for NPR and Deborah Eisenberg’s “Your Duck is My Duck” for The Los Angeles Times.

Laverne Frith reviewed "Things as It Is" by Chase Twichell for the New York Journal of Books.

Joan Silverman reviewed Ben Marcus’ “Notes From the Fog” for the Portland Press Herald.

V. Joshua Adams reviewed Mark Polizzotti's “Sympathy for the Traitor: A Translation Manifesto” for The Los Angeles Review of Books. 

Lanie Tankard reviewed Irish author Peter Cunningham's novel “Acts of Allegiance” for her October "Eye on the Indies" column in The Woven Tale Press.

NBCC Balakian winner and former board member Ron Charles reviewed Mitch Albom’s “The Next Person You Meet in Heaven” as a video book review for the Washington Post.

Lydia Pyne reviewed “The Dinosaur Artist” by Paige Williams for the Los Angeles Review of Books.

VP of Membership Anjali Enjeti interviewed American Ferrera about her new book "American Like Me" for Newsday. Enjeti reviewed Nicole Chung's "All You Can Ever Know" for the Minneapolis Star Tribune and Barbara Kingsolver's "Unsheltered" for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Heller McAlpin reviewed Kathryn Harrison’s new memoir, “On Sunset,” for the Washington Post.

Katherine Coldiron reviewed Shelley Jackson’s newest novel “Riddance” for Popscure, Tana French’s “The Witch Elm” as an argument about privilege called the Lucky Loop for the Mantle, and “Codex” by Icelandic author Sjón for the Los Angeles Review of Books.

NBCC president Kate Tuttle interviewed Stephen L. Carter about his grandmother's life, which led to his new nonfiction book “Invisible” for the Boston Globe.

Anita Felicelli reviewed Esi Edugyan's "Washington Black" for the San Francisco Chronicle.

Jeffrey Ann Goudie reviewed Susan Orlean's "The Library Book" for the Minneapolis Star Tribune.


Other News

Justin Taylor’s longform critical survey of Mary Robison is in the new issue of The Sewanee Review (#504) and is also available for free on the journal's website.

Xujun Eberlein's translation of the renowned Chinese writer Wang Zengqi's short story  "Revenge" was published in New England Review.

Star Tribune books editor and NBCC board member Laurie Hertzel was interviewed for Poets and Writers magazine about life as a book critic. She was also interviewed on WTIP radio in northern Minnesota, explaining (among other things) how she chooses the books to be reviewed.

NBCC Member Anita Felicelli’s book "Love Songs for a Lost Continent" was published on October 1 by Stillhouse Press. 

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, winner of the NBCC's fiction award for her novel “Americanah”, has been honored with the PEN Pinter prize. Adhichie also opened this year's Frankfurt Book Fair with an impassioned speech calling for "new storytellers.”

NBCC member Fran Bigman wrote about being with the Haruki Murakami Superfans at a Midnight Launch Party for Lit Hub.



NBCC members note: Your reviews seed this roundup; please send items, including news about your new publications and recent honors, to With reviews, please include title of book and author, as well as name of publication. Make sure to send links that do not require a subscription or username and password.​ We love dedicated URLs. We do not love hyperlinks.

The Craft of Criticism: An Interview with Ilana Masad

by Tara Cheesman | Oct-12-2018

In this Q&A series, The Craft of Criticism, NBCC members Tara Cheesman and Fran Bigman ask book critics and review editors for their thoughts about contemporary criticism. If you’re interested in being interviewed for the series,please get in touch at and

Ilana Masad is a queer Israeli-American fiction writer and book critic whose reviews have appeared in the New Yorker, the New York Times, the Washington Post, NPR, the LA Times, the LA Review of Books, the Guardian, and more. She is the founder and host of The Other Stories, a podcast featuring new, emerging, and established writers. She spends too much time on Twitter, and you can spend that time with her @ilanaslightly.

How did you become a book critic?

I’ve loved reading for a long time, obviously. But it wasn’t until my late teens that I began contemplating how to make a living out of this love. I knew it would be hard, almost impossible, because I was lucky enough to have parents who encouraged my desires while also warning me of the pitfalls and difficulties of any kind of remuneration for creative work. But more to the point: I spent a year abroad at the University of Oxford while I was in college and we were encouraged to take part of the full Oxford experience. So I became a sub-editor (proofreader) at The Oxford Student, one of the two big weekly student newspapers. In my second term, I became the editor of the Arts & Literature section. The same year, I wrote my first book reviews for a small and still active website run by Molly Gaudry, Lit Pub. In my senior year of college I interned at an online publication called Bookish, and when my internship was done, I had made friends with two of the editors, and became a freelancer for them - I wrote lists, mostly, not straight-up book reviews. It wasn’t until I freelanced after college for Bustle that I was invited to write an honest-to-god book review for pay (very, very meager pay, but pay nonetheless), and that was for A Little Life by Hanya Yanagihara. I was hooked. I loved it as much as I knew I would. So I began figuring out how to do more of it, who to pitch, how to get paid, etc.

In a 2017 interview with Lithub you describe your reviews as “forms of book criticism that are hidden in other formats because the publication [Broadly] just doesn’t do straight reviews. With straight reviews becoming rarer, book critics have learned to be more dynamic. We’ve had to.” Can you explain how that perspective affects the way you approach the books you review?

It doesn’t affect my approach to the books I review exactly - it affects my approach to how I pitch book reviews or culture pieces. For example, a few months ago, I pitched Buzzfeed a piece about mental illness as explored in fiction. I was in my first year of grad school and had just read Jean Rhys for the first time and was thinking about mental illness and women’s madness as portrayed in literature (a subject I’ve been interested in since college, really). I was thinking about how mental illness is getting portrayed less metaphorically these days, and found some recent books that were doing what I had intuited was being done - from staying abreast of recent and current publications. In pitching that piece, I was thinking about books as both reflections of culture and as spaces where discussions still slow to occur in broader public spheres were happening. And so I got to read and write about several books in one piece.

Another way I figured out how to write about books was through a publication’s particular interest. For Broadly, for example, I wrote several pieces about books that dealt with historical figures - women, specifically - and these pieces became a mish-mash of historical exploration and review. If I had my druthers, I would be reviewing single books one at a time because I think that single book reviews do plenty to explore culture already. But they don’t get the clicks editors want and need, so they’re becoming less common and harder to come by.

How important do you feel it is for a critic’s voice, opinions and personality to be present in a review?

I find that my style depends a lot on the publication I’m writing for and whether they want my voice in there or not. NPR, for instance, wants me to be voicy. The NYT has a different style - slightly voicy, then down to business, possibly voicy in closing again. Here’s the thing, though - whatever the style of the publication, and whether the critic admits it or not, their voice and opinions and personality are inevitably going to be in there. Because when we read, we’re connecting with something personal, aren’t we? Whether it’s relating to characters’ experiences or simply reading through the lens of empathy, our personalities and personhoods are going to be involved in the process. So I don’t know that it’s important, per se, that a critic’s voice is clear in a review - rather, I think it’s inevitable. There is nothing objective about criticism, despite the certainty imbued in the work of some white, straight, cis male critics. Objectivity seems to be what they believe they’re doing, as if their positionality in the world is neutral. It isn’t - neither is yours, nor mine. No one is neutral. That being said, I do try to approach criticism not as an exercise of “do I like it” but rather by trying to see if a book is succeeding at what it’s trying to do, and what it means for the project of the book when it does or doesn’t succeed.

“Literary Citizenship” is an idea that gets talked about a lot in certain parts of the book world. You’re a contributor at Book Riot -- a site where one of the core tenets is “reading is a political act”. You also frequently grapple with social and political topics in your reviews and on social media. How important do you think it is for a critic to also be an activist?

Gosh. What a fantastic question. And so difficult! I feel like I could talk through this one for hours and still not have a good response. Okay, so I do believe that reading is a political act, yes. And I know that the reviews I pitch are often politically motivated - by which I mean, that I tend to privilege marginalized or underserved voices pretty much by instinct at this point, because I simply find these stories to be more interesting, more reflective of a larger, broader and more complex world.

I know, and I’m not entirely proud of this, that there are books that are probably very good that I’ve simply ignored because I’ve grown tired with the hegemony of the straight white male experience. There are widely beloved and lauded authors that I’m simply exhausted and, honestly, bored by. The fact that I still feel the need to hedge about it or apologize for it in some way is saying something, I suppose, about the training I’ve received in who matters and who doesn’t… So yes, I think about my choices when I read. But I also don’t read just for the politics. I think that it comes down to the feminist slogan of how the personal is political, and in the case of the critic, the personal and political might also become the published, making it a shared personal and political space.

I think literary citizenship goes beyond my reviews though. My podcast is about literary citizenship. Talking to other writers and boosting the work I care about on social media and telling people to buy and read books - this is literary citizenship. Talking about the deep-seated issues in big publishing, the systemic racism and classism that is so deeply rooted in the trade, that’s literary citizenship. Is that activism? I don’t know. I honestly don’t. I sometimes worry that if what I’m doing benefits the world I am a part of, then it’s not activism because it’s not selfless. That’s probably very silly, though. No one said activism couldn’t be something you enjoy, something that comes naturally to you. But in the midst of everything going on right now, it’s hard to see anything I do in the literary world as worth much. It’s hard, often, to remember that art is necessary. But I try to remind myself that no revolution has occurred without art being involved in it - and so perhaps, maybe, I’m doing my part, in a way.

But honestly, when I think of activism, I think of what I do in the classroom as a new teacher, and I think about the volunteer work I do for a queer suicide prevention organization. Those things feel more tangible as activism. Books are still my solace, my escape, my absolute favorite things to engage with, and I am so, so lucky that my hard work to make them my livelihood is paying off.

You mentioned your podcast, The Other Stories. What inspired you to start it, how you choose the people you talk to, and why you think podcasts (which in a way is a pretty old fashioned concept, a long form radio show, dressed up in new packaging) have become so popular?

The Other Stories is a labor of love. I started it when I was freelancing and living in New York after graduating from college. I kept thinking about how writers don’t get to talk about their work much. Not the big, famous writers who are interviewed everywhere, but the rest of us, those of us writing stories and sending them to magazines, trying to find agents, trying to get noticed. Sure, we might get a story published here or there, and we’ll send it to our friends and our moms and they’ll say “Hey, that’s great!” and “I loved your story!” and then… that’s it. They won’t ask about the process of writing it. They won’t ask about why we chose to make the walls maroon in this scene. Writing is lonely in that we don’t know what the people on the other end are getting out of our work unless they tell us. So the podcast was this way of creating a space to give new, struggling, as-yet-not-famous writers a voice.

The Other Stories features these writers, has them read their work aloud (and dresses them up in new packaging, as you so nicely put it, because of the added component of sound design; Mike Cahill writes original scores for each and every story), and then I interview them about their writing process and writing history. I think - I hope - that it gives a space for writers to feel legit, to see that their work is real, their process is real, their creativity and artisanship are real. Not that I make them real, but rather it’s all too easy for us all to succumb to impostor syndrome. An interview, a real conversation about the process, takes us out of that space a little bit, I think.

Why are podcasts working so well these days? I think the form is popular for several reasons - it’s taking the radio, like you said, and putting it in places we access more, like our computers and phones. And it’s ideal for multitasking, which has become the de rigeur way of being in the world in our achievement-and-productivity-obsessed culture. There’s something about audio that lends itself to movement, too, I think, and since the whole “couch potato” narrative is so reviled nowadays (even though we all still watch TV), podcasts seem to be a good in between - you can exercise with it, you can wash dishes while listening, you can fold laundry, you can walk or drive to work with it on. Basically, it is useful for a less stagnant lifestyle.

Become a Member of the NBCC

NBCC Awards

Finalists for 2017

See all award winners

Find out how to submit

Read how we select

Frequently Asked Questions

Videos and Podcasts

NBCC 2017 Awards Ceremony

NBCC 2017 Finalists Reading

All videos and podcasts.

From the Critical Mass blog

Maggie Nelson, Bernard Hooper, and Kathryn Harrison

Reviews & Interviews The latest in NBCC's Craft of Criticism series is Tara Cheesman's Q and A with Ilana Masad. NBCC Emerging Critic Natania

The Craft of Criticism: An Interview with Ilana Masad

In this Q&A series, The Craft of Criticism, NBCC members Tara Cheesman and Fran Bigman ask book critics and review editors for their thoughts about

NBCC Reads: Natalia Holtzman on David Albahari’s ‘Leeches’

What are your favorite works in translation? That's the question that launched this summer's NBCC Reads series, which draws upon the bookish passions

NBCC Reads: Jenny Bhatt on Raymond Queneau’s ‘Exercises in Style’

What are your favorite works in translation? That's the question that launched this summer's NBCC Reads series, which draws upon the bookish passions